Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: j_tull

Your point is well taken, except that I truly didn’t mean for “in private” to apply to bunks or barracks or submarines or any other place on military property. That, in my book, is not private.

I was referring in that sentence to civilian life.

The behavior you describe would surely merit military discipline.

Thanks for your service. I can’t imagine how hard life would be in close quarters on a sub, although I have a close relative who spent a career under the Pacific. Hats off to you and your buddies.


176 posted on 01/04/2011 9:45:43 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah

The repeal of DADT voids discipline under military law. The Buttsharks won’t bother rewriting Article 125 of the UCMJ, they will simply ignore it. This is one of those things I quit thinking about with a short prayer, “Lord, Thy will be done...”


177 posted on 01/04/2011 9:56:26 PM PST by j_tull (I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson