Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“The impression here is of a big, long aircraft, 70+ feet from nose to tail, which would make sense for a number of reasons. Rob Hewson at Jane’s has reported that Russia has supplied 32,000-pound thrust 117S engines for the J-20, which would be adequate for an aircraft in the 80,000 pound class – with perhaps lower supercruise performance and agility than an F-22, but with larger weapon bays and more fuel” writes aerospace analyst Bill Sweetman, editor of Aviation Week/DTI.


2 posted on 01/04/2011 5:09:10 AM PST by WaterBoard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WaterBoard
Larger weapons bays plus more fuel ( = longer range) would make sense for a plane whose primary purpose would be to tangle with our carrier fighter wings.

I wonder if the weapons bay is big enough to accommodate a Harpoon-class anti-ship missile? Perhaps nuke-tipped?

4 posted on 01/04/2011 5:27:12 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: WaterBoard

It will make a bigger hole in the ground.


15 posted on 01/04/2011 6:28:45 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson