To: DManA; BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; Sun; EternalVigilance
The first sentence belies the headline. The judge ordered that the husband be allowed to decide. If he’d decided to keep her on life support she would have been kept on life support. Not true.
Greer ordered that Terri be deprived of nutrition and hydration and his orders were carried out at gunpoint.
27 posted on
01/03/2011 11:28:12 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Don't complain to me. Write a letter to LifeNews.com for messing up the story.
The Florida state judge who allowed the former husband of disabled patient Terri Schiavo to take her life
30 posted on
01/03/2011 11:35:07 AM PST by
DManA
To: wagglebee
“Greer ordered that Terri be deprived of nutrition and hydration and his orders were carried out at gunpoint. “
Because Terri’s husband requested that action be taken.
31 posted on
01/03/2011 11:38:10 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: wagglebee
Also Not True: “If he’d decided to keep her on life support she would have been kept on life support.”
Terri was NOT on “life support”.
Terri had a feeding tube but could very likely have re-learned to swallow,
with physical therapy.
Too bad her murderous spouse denied her so much, which would have
improved her quality of life.
74 posted on
01/04/2011 9:29:06 AM PST by
Lesforlife
(Co-sponsor Personhood CO 2010 ~ Woo Hoo 62!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson