>I advocate ending SS entirely. You want to continue it AND saddle productive people with a massive backdoor tax increase. Who’s the Marxist now?
Find me the votes to end Social Security cold turkey and we’ll talk. Since you won’t be able to, you’re just spouting off about pipe dreams.
In the meantime people will actually work on how to trim back the cost of the program and it’s level of support which is the only realistic way of eventually killing it.
It should be allowed to collapse entirely then, than continue in a manner thats 'politically tenable'.
Why would a conservative advocate continuing it in a manner that even more closely resembles another entitlement program for the needy?