Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter

>All I’ve said is lets start making the TAKERS go without first.

Fine. First define “takers”

Then figure out how much money that is (much less than you expect).

Then look at the budget projections for Social Security and Medicare. They are going to blow the budget and eat most of GDP before long unless some drastic stuff is done. It doesn’t matter if you pay 0$ in other government expenditures, those two programs will run off the rails in short order, and unless they are confronted, it makes no difference at all.


264 posted on 01/02/2011 2:43:55 PM PST by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: drbuzzard
Fine. First define “takers”

Those who take and don't give.

I'm well aware SS is mathematically unsustainable. I know where the US budget it spent.

I disagree with your phrase 'means test'. It smacks of marxist doublespeak. And I don't buy your justification for using it.

The system needs fixing, fit it. Don't enable it.

274 posted on 01/02/2011 2:51:03 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson