Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

True Grit Redux
Townhall.com ^ | December 31, 2010 | Suzanne Fields

Posted on 12/31/2010 12:28:39 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: pissant

Casablanca and the original True Grit are two very different movies. For one thing True Grit is held back by the presence of Glen Cambell who never did figure out how to act. For another the first movie is very losely based on a book, this second movie isn’t a remake it’s much more tightly based on the same book. The new movie is excellent, one of the best westerns ever, in the level of Unforgiven, and significantly better than the original which really only ever had Duke going for it.


61 posted on 12/31/2010 2:29:20 PM PST by discostu (this is defninitely not my confused face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Oh, please. Did John Wayne make a bomb or two? Of course! But, I’m sorry, Lee Marvin was always a (great!)secondary character actor who got jacked up to primary actor when the studio system fell apart. The Duke is fantastic in Rio Bravo and good in every other movie he ever did. And he’s wonderful in True Grit and deserved his Oscar.


62 posted on 12/31/2010 2:30:14 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

The Searchers... my favorite!!! A great Blu Ray transfer!

LLS


63 posted on 12/31/2010 2:30:26 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a dim to enter the kingdom of GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

We had a debate... we didn’t disagree! ;-) I agree with you completely!

LLS


64 posted on 12/31/2010 2:32:51 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a dim to enter the kingdom of GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Everyone keeps saying the original is based “loosely” on the original. But it is not. It is very close to the novel. What am I - or other folks - missing?


65 posted on 12/31/2010 2:34:29 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Isn’t it lovely to agree? Happy New Year, you liblieslayer!


66 posted on 12/31/2010 2:35:18 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nevergiveup; Cinnamon Girl

DITTOS to what you said... My wife and I went to see it with our 22 year old grandson on Monday and I told them the same thing when we left the theater


67 posted on 12/31/2010 2:36:12 PM PST by tubebender (The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in Eureka...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
TRUE GRITS!


68 posted on 12/31/2010 2:38:10 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Happy New Year to you and yours FRiend!

LLS


69 posted on 12/31/2010 2:45:10 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a dim to enter the kingdom of GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

The original movie isn’t told as a flashback, Mattie keeps her arm, Chaney is played by an actor 30 years older than the character in the book, LeBouf is on his trail for love in the movie and for money in the book, Duke has his “usual” weapons assortment (pistol and large loop rifle) while in the book Rooster wields 2 Navy 6s, the movie clearly happens in Colorado (a “classic” western area) as opposed to the Arkansas/ Oklahoma area of the book. Then there’s the over all tone, the book is more brutal and more humorous (gallows humor but humor all the same) than the first movie.


70 posted on 12/31/2010 2:46:23 PM PST by discostu (this is defninitely not my confused face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: b9

“I liked all the actors in the new True Grit except for Bridges’ long-hair-maggot-infested Rooster Cogburn.”

I have heard from a few folks that Bridges’ portrayal of Rooster Cogburn is basically The Dude as a cowboy.


71 posted on 12/31/2010 2:58:24 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (Regulation without representation is tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nevergiveup

“3-BestSupportingActressOscar”

How do you give the supporting Oscar to someone who was onscreen almost the entire film?
I suppose Natalie Portman is already writing her acceptance speech for Best Actress, but ...
Poor Natalie was robbed in 1994 when she gave the best performance of the year (and of her acting career) in “The Professional” and didn’t even get nominated; so perhaps this is her year to get even.


72 posted on 12/31/2010 3:05:01 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

You’re nice!


73 posted on 12/31/2010 3:32:50 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Thank you mam... you are too.

LLS


74 posted on 12/31/2010 3:37:22 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a dim to enter the kingdom of GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This reminds me of the two Miracle on 34th Street movies. Why a remake when the original was just fine? Well, I like both; they are different enough (the new one even involves prayer and church—the old one seems more pc on that point, oddly enough) to enjoy. Neither one is perfect, but they each have their charm.

I’ll wait until True Grit comes on TV; it will be interesting to see the different approaches to the characters and the story.

Like good music, a good story is worth hearing more than once and even from different story-tellers.


75 posted on 12/31/2010 3:44:15 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Well, I might have gone to see it but I can't stand the matt demonrat...unless someone put a slug between his little rat eyeballs........just my opinion.
76 posted on 12/31/2010 3:45:28 PM PST by marmar ((Although, I may look different then you....my blood still runs..RED, WHITE, & BLUE. RETIRED USAF))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
just jack up the horse and drive a new script under it, or a revamped script for RIO BRAVO-EL DORADO-RIO LOBO.

You want a movie with the REAL old west falvor? See Charlton Heston in WILL PENNY or Lee Marvin in MONTE WALSH

without a doubt they WERE THE SAME MOVIE....was the cheap payday worth the lack of creativity....

Will Penny and Monte Walsh were both excellent. the ‘Walsh’ vehicle was ‘ok’ with the Selleck remake...just ok...I dont understand why they needed to remake it.

I have heard that they are thinking of remaking JAWS with Tracy Morgan as Hooper....WTF?...

77 posted on 12/31/2010 3:55:19 PM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
What am I - or other folks - missing?

Nothing. The Duke has an emotional connection with most of us on FR (as he was a patriot) that tends to cloud judgment. I thought the new TG was excellent and stands on it's own merit. I thought it was well done and Bridge's was excellent. As was the little lass. This does not minimize the Duke's work. There are many Actors who's work stands the test of time.

78 posted on 12/31/2010 3:56:47 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Ah! Someone has a taste for South Carolina Low Country Cuisine! :-D


79 posted on 12/31/2010 3:57:54 PM PST by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
As the saying goes, there is no accounting for taste. Over the last 40 years, movies have gone from popular entertainment with a good dose of surrealism thrown in, to artsy-fartsy endeavors or films with over the top realism and/or extreme special effects injected to rouse the senses, leaving little to the human imagination. IMO, the vast majority of movies released in the last 25-30 years aren't worth my time or the high price of admission.

Not knocking the Cohen brothers. They make well written, well directed, high quality productions but they tend to be quirky and off beat. If you like dark, dreary, graphically violent and bloody films, the Cohen brothers are for you. I suppose one day I'll catch the new True Grit. Just not right now.

When you take into account the inflation factor, John Wayne is the biggest box office draw of all time. Wayne is still one of America's most popular movie stars, 32 years after his death. The Duke has kept right up there with the likes of Harrison Ford, Will Smith and Tom Hanks.

While I wasn't impressed with the original True Grit or Wayne's performance, both have gotten better over time. I read that when True Grit author Charles Portis was writing the book, he had John Wayne in mind to play Rooster Cogburn. In fact, Portis was an unofficial adviser of sorts on the original True Grit, but declined to have any input on the Cohen brothers version.

Here's a picture of Charles Portis discussing things with the Duke on the film set of the original 1969 True Grit.


80 posted on 12/31/2010 4:23:41 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson