because there are no innocent lives at risk inside, but they do have guns and will shoot officers entering and flush their white powder down the toilet or toss it in boiling oil.
A lot of people have guns. Is the risk of a white powder being flushed in the potty, or placing it in boiling oil, worth killing over? Apparently you think so. In any case, I though getting rid of drugs was a good thing, and here you’re offering a way to accomplish exactly that, except that you somehow want to avoid that from happening. What gives?
Incidentally, if you support violent no-knock raids for non-violent circumstances like suspected drug possession it means that to you, it’s worth killing people to preserve evidence that might put someone behind bars. I suggest that placing a conviction at higher value than preserving human lives is reversed, un-Christian, and supportive of tyranny. (Read your own tagline.)
This would be true even if no-knocks were never at wrong addresses, and never killed innocent people. But they do both of those things too.