Nonsense. You just don't like the fact that I exposed the internet ramblings of lunatics for what they are. (John Bad Elk and Plummer.) Nor do you like the fact that I actually located and cited to case precedent rather than making conclusory statements without any authority. Everything I posted in this thread is backed up by the law. You might not like that current state of the law, but it is the law. If you feel that the law is wrong, then you need to work within the established system to change the law.
Believe what you want, but the law isn't on your side. Feel free to act on your erroneous interpretations of the law at your own peril.
Sorry, you lack the authority or the credibility to tell me or anyone else what they do or do not like.
So anyone with an opinion different than yours is a lunatic? I guess lunatics are in the majority then.
I believe that is what I directly indicated, you claimed otherwise.
I will.