You haven't proven anything. You rambled a bunch of nonsense and made conclusory statements.
The fact is, in your State, your contentions are nothing but rambling fantasy:
"Self-help measures undertaken by a potential defendant who objects to the legality of the search can lead to violence and serious physical injury. The societal interest in the orderly settlement of disputes between citizens and their government outweighs any individual interest in resisting a questionable search. United States v. Ferrone, 438 F.2d 381, 390 (3rd Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 402 U.S. 1008, 91 S.Ct. 2188, 29 L.Ed.2d 430 (1971). Accord, State v. Hatton, 116 Ariz. 142, 568 P.2d 1040 (1977); State v. Miller, 282 N.C. 633, 194 S.E.2d 353 (1973). One can reasonably be asked to submit peaceably and to take recourse in his legal remedies... We hold that a private citizen may not use force to resist a search by an authorized police officer engaged in the performance of his duties whether or not the arrest is illegal. The question remains whether the use of force in resisting a search pursuant to an illegal arrest constitutes a battery upon a police officer acting in the “lawful discharge of his duties,” as set forth in s 40A-22-23... A police officer who makes an arrest should not lose all his authority if the arrest is subsequently judged to be unlawful. Police officers must be free to carry out their duties without being subjected to interference and physical harm." New Mexico v. Doe, 583 P.2d 464, 467 (N.M. 1978).
You can throw a tantrum if you like, but the fact is, the law does not support the nonsense that you are rambling here. And we both know that you don't actually believe your own rambling either. If you think you are right, why don't you go open carry on the premises of a University? Then make your case in Court? If you are so sure that the statute is illegal, why don't you prove it?
Ah, because we both know that you don't actually believe the tripe you are posting here.
If you REALLY believed what you were saying, you'd live according to those beliefs.
Really, how can you possibly know that I am not acting on them?
What if, and I posit this as a hypothetical so as to force anyone wishing to deprive me of my rights the burden of proof, I were to take my weapon and open carry while voting [02 Nov 10] in a polling place which happens to be an elementary school, given that NMSA 30-7-2.1 — Unlawful carrying of a deadly weapon on school premises makes it a felony to carry a weapon on Elementary School premises. {"Whoever commits unlawful carrying of a deadly weapon on school premises is guilty of a fourth degree felony."}
Why then were there NO CHARGES brought against me? It SHOULD be an open and shut case for the prosecution, no?
For one, there is the State Constitution prohibiting such a law; for another the Federal Law Conspiracy Against Rights may be applied against arresting officers [being more than one person] should they insist continue to hold me in a false arrest.
You can throw a tantrum if you like, but the fact is, the law does not support the nonsense that you are rambling here. And we both know that you don't actually believe your own rambling either. If you think you are right, why don't you go open carry on the premises of a University? Then make your case in Court? If you are so sure that the statute is illegal, why don't you prove it?
Well, for starters being a student I wanted to finish up my degree without any hassles, and even you have to admit that taking a stand while perusing a degree would be a hassle. But AFTER getting the degree, I am free from any sort of retaliation that the university might wish to impose as they cannot hold as ransom the degree for which I have worked, paid, and should receive.
The University statute is the first one I intend to attack, as it is only a misdemeanor offense and cannot therefore be used to unilaterally strip me of my rights.
Though an interesting case would be the City- and Municipal-Courthouses as the State Constitution says "No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms." Therefore, the courts which are municipal or county should not have ANY right to post "No Weapons" upon their properties under their own authority, correct?
Your cut and pastes do nothing to answer the direct questions posed to you or the issues raised.
I must conclude based on your statements, and lack thereof in other instances, that your interest is not in freedom or liberty or justice, but rather eroding the same when it suits your views.