No, he did not. What he did was how amateurs constantly read Court opinions. He picked through dicta and stopped reading, ignored the holding and then made a conclusory statement without any support.
The 4th Amendment contains the word “unreasonable”. That word is the key to the entire amendment, for the 4th Amendment only prohibits UNREASONABLE searches and seizures.
Libertines want to define the word for themselves, however the Constitution doesn’t give the libertines the authority to do so.
Do you have a list of approved interpreters of court opinions? Here I thought they were written for the benefit of all citizens. (amateurs)
There is nothing reasonable about a no knock entry. You have indicated their utility in limited instances. By the numbers, it is much less limited today than 30 years ago.
To what do you attribute the increase?
Perhaps it would be easier and safer for LE to classify ALL warrants as high risk and every home a stronghold? (sarcasm)
We the people have the final say, libertine or otherwise.