Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Squeezes Foreigners for Share of Global Riches (Multinationals still getting played)
WSJ ^ | 12/28/10 | SHAI OSTER, NORIHIKO SHIROUZU And PAUL GLADER

Posted on 12/30/2010 8:31:29 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

China Squeezes Foreigners for Share of Global Riches

By SHAI OSTER, NORIHIKO SHIROUZU And PAUL GLADER

BEIJING—Foreign companies have been teaming up with Chinese ones for years to gain access to the giant Chinese market. Now some of the world's biggest companies are taking a risky but potentially rewarding second step—folding pieces of their world-wide operations into partnerships with Chinese companies to do business around the globe.

General Electric Co. is finalizing plans for a 50-50 joint venture with a Chinese military-jet maker to produce avionics, the electronic brains of aircraft. The deal with Aviation Industry Corp. of China would give GE access to a Chinese government project aimed at challenging Boeing Co. and Airbus in the civilian-aircraft market.

General Motors Co. established a joint venture this year with SAIC Motor Corp., its longtime partner in China, to produce and sell their no-frills Wuling-brand microvans in India, and eventually in Southeast Asia and other emerging markets as well.

The two deals show China Inc.'s growing international ambitions, as well as its increasing leverage over foreign partners. To make the GE deal happen, GE Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt made an extraordinary concession, agreeing to fold into the venture all of GE's existing world-wide business in nonmilitary avionics. GM, in its deal, contributed technology, its manufacturing facilities in India and use of its Chevrolet brand name in that market.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; freetrade; jointventure; mercantilism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021 last
To: stig
Patriotism should be our first consideration.

Of course. The very word is internally limiting in that. If it ain't you aren't is the best way to put it.

21 posted on 12/30/2010 4:53:24 PM PST by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson