I think we should leave hyper-emotionalism crap to the liberals and stick to logic and reason.
The usual procedure here is to join, then lurk for, oh, half a decade, before posting anything. Some here take great offence to any deviation from normal, especially if the newb posts articles contrary to certain established facts.
"We"?
::snort:: LOL!
You just outed yourself, you collectivist Rat troll. "We" conservatives speak for ourselves, not some groupthink collective. "We" say "I" and stand by our individual opinions. There is no "we" among "us," you stupid moran. That's what "we" share in individual common - and what "you" will never collectively understand.
Slink away back to your focus group and report your failure, loser.
"We"?
::snort:: LOL!
You just outed yourself, you collectivist Rat troll. "We" conservatives speak for ourselves, not some groupthink collective. "We" say "I" and stand by our individual opinions. There is no "we" among "us," you stupid moran. That's what "we" share in individual common - and what "you" will never collectively understand.
Slink away back to your focus group and report your failure, loser.
Beck teaches logic and reason.. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, ....George Santayana
First off, it is not “hyper-emotionalism” which leads me to the error of your second assertion. If liberals are incapable of discerning issues by reason and logic, then how is one to enlighten them to the reality of this society without the use of emotion?
Obviously you know nothing of fishing and how to accomplish the task of actually hooking one, nor do you know anything about the greatest fisher of all time.