“We’d be much better off with Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkanian.”
We’d be better off without RINO traitors who prefer Harry Reid to Sharron Angle.
The time to get behind Angle was back in October. That ship has sailed. Sure you might not have liked Angle, but voting for Harry Reid because she’s too teapartish?
I thought RINOs like you were supposed to get behind the nominees, not vote with the enemy.
“We’d be much better off with Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkanian.”
We’d be better off without RINO traitors who prefer Harry Reid to Sharron Angle.
Well, there you go again.
Assuming that I would vote for Harry Reid over Angle is just plain stupid. Given the choice, surely I would have supported Angle over Reid.
Let me simplify things a little for you. There are others out there that were far better suited to DEFEAT AND REMOVE Harry Reid from Washington. I believe there are plenty that could have defeated him that are as or more conservative than Angle. They weren’t there so why derail Sue Lowden or Danny Tarkanian?
Personally, I’d rather get 80% of what I want instead of 0%. With Harry Reid, I got 0%.
If you believe both Sue Lowden and Danny Tarkanian were RINOs, you might do a little research.
Personally, neither Angle or O’Donnell displayed the intellectual firepower to get elected. That’s why we have Reid and Coons.