Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid's Rules Scheme To Rewrite Defeat
Human Events ^ | December 29, 2010 | Emily Miller

Posted on 12/29/2010 1:13:21 PM PST by La Lydia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: a fool in paradise

Still kinda stunned by the LameDuck legislation.

Some huge changes just steamrolled through and the Republicans, for all their fiery rhetoric, caved like a bunch of Obama groupies.

‘Significant disruption to combat units’ - General Amos.


21 posted on 12/29/2010 1:38:02 PM PST by swarthyguy (KIDS! Deficit, Debt,Taxes! Pfft Lookit the bright side of our legacy -America is almost SmokFrei!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

This makes no sense at all. They are not going to get anything controversial through the Republican House, and they run a real risk of turning over the Senate to the Republicans in 2012. There is much to be lost and nothing to be gained by such an action.


22 posted on 12/29/2010 1:38:30 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Anyone remember “The Gang of Fourteen?”


23 posted on 12/29/2010 1:40:57 PM PST by itsahoot (We the people, allowed Republican leadership to get us here, only God's Grace can get us out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

LET THEM DO IT , EASIER FOR THE COMING 2012 REPUBLICAN SENATE MAJORITY TO GET ALL KINDS OF THINGS REPEALED.


24 posted on 12/29/2010 1:41:03 PM PST by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

We have the most f’d up government transition laws in the anglosphere! It’s nothing to wave the flag about or to be proud of. Just look at how American voters have been defied since Nov 2. It’s a disgrace.


25 posted on 12/29/2010 1:41:11 PM PST by balls (Government workers have plundered our wealth. Demand reparations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Seems to me to be a great idea. Nothing can be passed without going through the House first, so the Senate will not be able to pass anymore of the DemocRAT agenda. With a lower threshold to pass the Repubs only have to get 4 Democrats on their side to pass what the House sends them. Might not be much of a problem coming up with those numbers with so many of the RATS facing a tough re-election bid in 2012.


26 posted on 12/29/2010 1:43:04 PM PST by RG3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Man

It’s a really big deal for supreme court appointments.


27 posted on 12/29/2010 1:43:20 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy; a fool in paradise
Republicans really gave the Democrats the most “productive” lame duck session ever, didn’t they.

I am livid. I have never been a third party guy, but I'm changing my view.

Watching the Dems during Bush's term taught me a lot about how they can use procedural rules to gum up the works when the want to; when they wanted to they were able to bring Bush's agenda to a complete stop even while they were in the minority.

So what did our guys do? All they had to do between the election and Christmas was slow-walk everything until the time ran out. They didn't. They talked about it but they didn't do it.

Now you have weak-links talking about "considering" what to do about Obama-care, and wondering aloud how they are going to work with the president. I get a queasy feeling about these guys, like we're about to be had again.

I don't think they realize how many people are about ready to wash their hands of the GOP. If they mess things up in January this party could split. The president is using the institutions of power to cloak a revolution. If the opposition doesn't use those same institutions to foil that revolution, bad things are coming.

28 posted on 12/29/2010 1:45:38 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BelegStrongbow

“If it passes, then the effect will be vivid and might take out every incumbent not clearly a conservative in 2012 (not to mention finally nailing the coffin of Obama’s hopes that year).”

It might have the opposite effect. With 60 votes for cloture, every RINO vote is important. If they don’t vote against cloture on a bad bill, they are exposed for what they are.

But with only 51 votes needed and a 53 dem majority, RINO’s could vote against bills they support and they would pass anyway. So I think it would make it easier for the RINO’s to hide who they are.

Then, when we take over the Senate majority, they will be back to being RINO’s and vote wrong whenever their vote makes a difference.


29 posted on 12/29/2010 1:47:28 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mapmaker77

Mitch and the gang have nothing to scratch.


30 posted on 12/29/2010 1:48:30 PM PST by JPG (YES SHE CAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RG3

I don’t understand what you are saying. Revenue bills must originate in the House; other bills may originate on either side. This is a recipe for having the rest of the Obama agenda rammed down our throats, in particular, judicial appointments and treaties such as START. But I do think if they do this they will come to regret it in two years, when 21 Dems in the Senate are up for re-election. I personally plan to take names.


31 posted on 12/29/2010 1:50:37 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Judicial appointments, other confirmable appointments, treaties.


32 posted on 12/29/2010 1:52:58 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Just remember Harry, when the Republicans are in control, THOSE RULES MAY VERY WELL STAY IN EFFECT FOR YOUR SIDE...

Thats what lame duck sessions are for.

Immediately following which the 'watchdog press' will resume their watchdog role.

33 posted on 12/29/2010 1:54:15 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Originaly the Senate Rules did not allow the close off of debate until Rule 22 was adopted after well over 130 yers. Prior to it being set at 60 votes as it stands currently it was first adopted at 67 votes in order to roll over Senator's stopping legislation deemed important.

The process of Cloture was proposed first in 1917 by none other than....

.

.

....wait for it...(shhhhh, Glen don't tell them)

.

. Woodrow Wilson

34 posted on 12/29/2010 1:54:34 PM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

“...January 3rd is a Sunday...”
-
Say what?


35 posted on 12/29/2010 2:01:32 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marron

I feel EXACTLY the same way. I remember how Daschle, or virtually any other dem Senator brought the dammed Senate to a near standstill when Bush was president. During the past couple of years, I’ve been wondering why in the hell haven’t WE been doing this?


36 posted on 12/29/2010 2:05:16 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: marron

Bingo. We can and should kill every piece of legislation that enters the house. This is the most divided America we have seen since the 1960s if not the civil war and the congress should be reflective of that.


37 posted on 12/29/2010 2:08:17 PM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Some huge changes just steamrolled through and the Republicans, for all their fiery rhetoric, caved like a bunch of Obama groupies.

It was not the Republicans, but rather essentially all or most of the Democrats and few to some of the Republicans. I'm sick of the RINOs here who constantly bash Republicans.

38 posted on 12/29/2010 2:09:43 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Oops, wrong year :( Jan 3rd would be a Federal Holiday then. Should be Jan 4th then.


39 posted on 12/29/2010 2:12:37 PM PST by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RC one; KoRn

Sometimes gridlock is your friend.

My view is that every piece of legislation should have to pass this first litmus test: Somehow we’ve survived two hundred and thirty years without this law. Why do we suddenly need it now?

A second more temporary litmus should be: the Obamists are going to be gone in two years. Why should we pass anything they want? Why should we not instead spend the next two years doing a proctological audit of Fannie Mae? or TARP? I seem to remember all that money going to districts that didn’t exist; isn’t anyone the least bit curious where the money did go?

Why not take a holiday from mucking up the law books and spend a little time holding the O accountable?


40 posted on 12/29/2010 2:14:23 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson