Goldberg makes an interesting point.
I think he is right that government-recognized gay relationships are an inevitability. In some respects, I don’t care — tax benefits, health insurance, hospital visitation, blah, blah. I’m fine with all of that. In other respects, it may be a good thing for society that homosexuals are embracing homosexual monogamy as opposed to homosexual promiscuity.
But — however it may be structured, whatever benefits it may entail, and whatever it may be called ... a gay union will never be a “marriage”. The one thing gay couples truly want is the one thing they can never recieve — moral equivalence ... no matter what legal and linguistic hoops you try to jump through a gay “marriage” will never be morally equivalent to a true marriage.
SnakeDoc
I am not. Homosexuality is a deviancy the same as pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia. They are all sexual dysfunctions. NO conservative is FOR legitimizing any sexual dysfunction.
The curious thing is, they're not. Records in Massachusetts showed that two-thirds of the "gay" marriages that took place were between women. When you consider that men are far more likely to be homosexual (about 2.5 percent of the male population) than women (1.4 percent of females), it means that a lesbian is about four times as likely to want "the ring" as a male homosexual. (That's women for ya, eh?)
So, no, homosexual males are not adopting the bourgeois life. Jonah doesn't get that because he doesn't accept that homosexuality is a real psychological phenomenon, and it's sick—not to mention poisonous to society. You can't legalize or regularize it, any more than you can regularize adultery, theft, or murder. All those behaviors are acts of war against society and virtue, and need to be marginalized, suppressed, and cured, like all sins, crimes, and disorders. Human nature is fallen, so the campaign never ends, but let's not be confused about what is normal.