As Gay Becomes Bourgeois

Townhall.com ^ | December 29, 2010 | Jonah Goldberg

[littleharbour]

Goldberg is the reason why I ended my run as a 15 year+ subscriber to NR. Typical effete “Metro-con” crap. He’s the type of “conservative” who snickers at the tea party rubes while eating Brie at a Manhattan cocktail party.

[mas cerveza por favor]

Now prove your absurd statement that “Many modern bishops are freemason and/or homosexual”

"Pope Paul VI dismissed [Archbishop Bugnini, author of the post-Vatican II New Mass] and exiled him to Iran because he had been convinced that the Archbishop was a Mason."

http://www.tanbooks.com/doct/vatican_liturgy.htm

A diocesan priest who crossed over to tradition told me that any bishop, even a "conservative," who permits gay masses is probably gay himself. Here is an Wikipedia article about some of the more obviously homosexual CINO bishops.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_bishops#Roman_Catholic_Church_in_modern_times

The book Good Bye Good Men chronicled the gay takeover of many seminaries. Here is an article documenting the Communist Party infiltration of the priesthood:

http://www.inatoday.com/20030728.htm

It is time for the Church to remove traitorous bishops by restarting the engines of Holy Inquisition.

[mas cerveza por favor]

This ambiguous conception is made very clear in the word games or battles—full of obscene allusions and double meanings—that are so popular in Mexico City.

These sh*t-talking competitions are no basis for asserting that Hispanic culture is gay-friendly. It is obvious that taking it up the rear end (mericon) is the lowest form of degradation. That does not mean that one who sticks him (bugeron) is not also sick in the head.

To back up your assertion, you will have to demonstrate there are practicing public bugerons that have maintained high status. I seriously doubt you will find any.

[Graybeard58]

These sh*t-talking competitions are no basis for asserting that Hispanic culture is gay-friendly

To back up your assertion

I made no such assertions.

Go back and reread my original reply. I asserted that the "catcher" was more disapproved of than the "pitcher"

You denied it, I proved it and you took a small portion of that proof way out of context and to top it off you still haven't backed up your absurd statement that "Catholic Bishops were homosexual and/or Free Masons".

[mas cerveza por favor]

Go back and reread my original reply. I asserted that the "catcher" was more disapproved of than the "pitcher"

That would be no different than any society, including our own. You said that provider/bugeron homosexuals were considered normal or acceptable in some Hispanic societies:

Graybeard58: "I understand that in some Hispanic societies that only the "catcher" is considered queer."

you still haven't backed up your absurd statement that "Catholic Bishops were homosexual and/or Free Masons".

First you falsely accuse me of misrepresenting you. Then you go on to misrepresent me by cutting off the qualifying words "many modern" from my statement. Apparently there is nothing you can dispute in my proof that many modern Catholic bishops are homosexual and/or Free Masons. Here is more proof from Bishop Fellay:

"we have big problems, and these problems mean that there's a fight in the church. You have different tendencies: you have the progressists, you have the conservative. And then also in Rome, you have certain other, other things, like "lobbies": Mafia, the Freemasons."

http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2006/03/rome-and-its-scarecrows.html