[onedoug]

...landing cases with scientifically verified residue, bits, pieces, impacts on the environment of various types etc....

Please direct me to some peer reviewed verification. Otherwise this is complete and utter nonsense.

[Quix]

Not tonight.

I don’t recall if it’s in a peer reviewed journal, or not.

I’m not impressed with that plea, however,

I’ve provided peer reviewed journal articles documenting that unhoaxed crop circles have a list of very exotic differences in the plants and the ground . . .

and naysayers like you just scoffed as usual.

Y’all are wedded to TYPE II ERRORS and seem to have no clue about how they can bite one in the rear every bit as devastatingly as a TYPE I ERROR.

Y’all have a LOT more ‘getting real’ to do in this field.