Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker

I’m sorry but some of you are dangerously ignorant of military reality.

You think I am somehow siding with obama because I don’t want our conventional weaknesses to lead to a nuclear exchange?? Did it ever occur to you that I don’t give a rat’s ass if we could just nuke China without consequences after they defeat us in Asia?

I guess it never occurred to you that a nuclear exchange includes them nuking us. You don’t have to get there if you don’t lose conventionally in the first place. You don’t want to get there. IMHO conventional weakness may eventually lead to a devastating nuclear war with the Chinese, or else a huge loss of our World position.


34 posted on 12/28/2010 9:00:04 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Williams
"IMHO conventional weakness may eventually lead to a devastating nuclear war with the Chinese, or else a huge loss of our World position."

That conventional weakness is already manifest. Oil and fuel will continue to go higher, IMO. We need to rebuild here.


49 posted on 12/29/2010 12:26:28 AM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson