No, she is not right. Even in the common sense. The Right to Life cannot naturally be left to the states. It cannot belong there.
FYI, I'm Roman Catholic, and have been anti-abortion all my live, even before I converted.
So what?
You're obviously of that school of fundamentalists who can be led down the primrose path by any candidate who makes the "right Christian noises", no matter how odious they and their behavior is in person. Huckabee is a joke.
You must be under the impression that I am defending Huckabee. I am not. I have never supported him, nor will I.
It is Life that I defend, the principles of Reagan, and of the Christian Right. Palin will not suffice, The Christian Right will *not* compromise on Life.
Huck's rise, yet again, proves it.
According to our CONSTITUTION, she is correct. And that is what counts at this stage.
"So what?"
So my anti-abortion chops are as good as yours, if not better.
"It is Life that I defend, the principles of Reagan, and of the Christian Right. Palin will not suffice, The Christian Right will *not* compromise on Life.
Ah, yes...Reagan. The man who signed California abortion-rights into law, is just great. While Palin, who supported an Alaskan pro-life constitutional amendment, who actually, personally, chose life, is not. Stupidity lives!!
"Huck's rise, yet again, proves it."
What it proves is that there are still a bunch of fundamentalists who can be led around by the nose by the right "Elmer Gantry", in this case, the "Huckster", which name fits the man to a "T".
The whole idea that anybody who isn't wildly in favor of a pro-life Constitutional Amendment is therefore pro-abortion is so stupid as to beggar the imagination, and exists for one reason, and one reason only...to peel off as much of Palin's anti-abortion support as possible.