To: Immerito
sad that Israel has succumbed to Darwinist pseudoscience.
2 posted on
12/28/2010 9:09:17 AM PST by
balch3
To: balch3
Oh, this article sucks, big time. Whoever wrote it doesn't kow the first thing about hominid evolution and I think that the researchers in Isreal played on that lack of knowledge.
First, to just say "Homo Sapiens" means nothing. There were four sub-species of Homo Sapiens: Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Modern Man), Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (Neaderthals), Homo Sapiens Steinheimnemsis and Homo Sapiens Cro-Magnon.
So, which sub-species did this particular tooth come from? The only way it could change the picture of evolution is if it came from Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Modern Man) since that sub-species arrived on the scene much later than the other three. If it was one of the other three sub-species, it becomes nothing more than an interesting find.
9 posted on
12/28/2010 9:30:12 AM PST by
84rules
( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
To: balch3
what exactly are you insinuating? That evolution is “pseudoscience”?
10 posted on
12/28/2010 9:33:12 AM PST by
rahbert
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson