Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America's Dangerous Rush to Shrink Its Military Power
Wall St Journal ^ | dec 27, 2010 | MARK HELPRIN

Posted on 12/27/2010 3:03:21 AM PST by The Raven

From the president on down through his secretary of defense, the service secretaries, and a cast of generals whose decorations would choke an alpine meadow with color, we are told that further reductions in American military power are warranted and unavoidable. This view is supported by the left, the right that unwisely fears accounting more than war, by most of the press, the academy, and perhaps a majority of Americans, and it is demonstrably and dangerously wrong.

Based upon nothing and ignoring the cautionary example of World War II, we are told that we will never face two major enemies at once. Despite the orders of battle of our potential adversaries and the fact that our response to insurgency has been primarily conventional, we are told that the era of conventional warfare is over. And we are told that we can rest easy because military spending is an accurate index of military power, and we spend as much as the next however many nations combined.

...snip

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Don W

“As for Europe and the rest of the free world, the USA basically said “Don’t worry about it, WE’LL look after defense against the communist bloc, or anything else that might come up.””

That’s my point. It was idiotic of the U.S. to do that for 50+ years. Those countries should have been cut loose decades ago.


21 posted on 12/27/2010 1:48:27 PM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
"That’s my point. It was idiotic of the U.S. to do that for 50+ years. Those countries should have been cut loose decades ago."

I agree with your point, but it's probably also why western europe has enjoyed it's longest period of peace.

22 posted on 12/27/2010 1:54:32 PM PST by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

“I agree with your point, but it’s probably also why western europe has enjoyed it’s longest period of peace. “

True, but if the Western European nations aren’t willing to do what it takes to defend themselves then they don’t deserve freedom. I’m all for helping but we took over too much of the task of protecting Europe.

Europe, Japan, and South Korea have also greatly benefited from the fact that they didn’t have to spend huge amounts of money on their own military, leaving more money to build factories to compete with us.


23 posted on 12/27/2010 2:01:22 PM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson