Skip to comments.
Gibbs: indefinite detention of terrorists regrettable
Politico ^
Posted on 12/26/2010 10:05:27 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Carling
Regrettable, yet necessary. No, there is a perfectly good alternative:
21
posted on
12/26/2010 11:34:29 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: Carling
From my point of view NOT REGRETTABLE. If you have had the opportunity to see these slimy murderous SOBs up close, you would agree. They have no conscience, no morality and no right to breath the same air we do.
22
posted on
12/26/2010 11:47:32 AM PST
by
eaglesiniowa
((Hope is not a course of action))
To: Sub-Driver
"Gibbs: indefinite detention of terrorists regrettable"He's absolutely right:
we should have executed them long ago.
What were our people thinking?
That we could rehabilitate them???
23
posted on
12/26/2010 11:47:48 AM PST
by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: Sub-Driver
Apprehend them. Try them in military court. Execute them.
The way it’s been done in every war in history.
24
posted on
12/26/2010 11:49:34 AM PST
by
Kozak
("It's not an Election it's a Restraining Order" .....PJ O'Rourke)
To: Redbob
"Gibbs: indefinite detention of terrorists regrettable"
You all are inserting a word into his sentence that's conspiculously missing: "Muslim".
To: FS11
Please remove me from your ping list
26
posted on
12/26/2010 12:04:16 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Sub-Driver
How’s the first presidential executive order spewed out by your Annointedidiot working out for you, idiotGibbs, “regrettable,” yet? =.=
27
posted on
12/26/2010 12:07:49 PM PST
by
cranked
To: Sub-Driver
28
posted on
12/26/2010 12:21:41 PM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Sub-Driver
29
posted on
12/26/2010 12:40:15 PM PST
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Sub-Driver
Did Gibbs clear his statements through JAssange first?
To: Sub-Driver
Reality is a b*tch ain't it Urkel?
31
posted on
12/26/2010 1:22:51 PM PST
by
Cyman
To: Sub-Driver
What is regrettable is the decision that the electorate made in 2008.
To: mylife
33
posted on
12/26/2010 4:54:59 PM PST
by
PA-RIVER
To: mylife
Where is the liberal outrage?!!It's hibernating until Sarah Palin takes the oath of office.
34
posted on
12/26/2010 4:56:17 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Sub-Driver
Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto.Funny how that little tidbit never saw the light of day.
35
posted on
12/26/2010 4:59:44 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Sub-Driver
"It's certainly not going to close in the next month," Gibbs said.Oh, no, of course not. Nobody would be as reckless as to declare that it would be closed that soon.
36
posted on
12/26/2010 5:01:36 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Sub-Driver
Gibbs did not note that all the restrictions were signed into law by Obama, albeit as part of broader legislation. Another measure further limiting Obama's power to move prisoners out of Guantanamo was passed by Congress last week and is awaiting his signature or veto. A) If he didn't veto previous legislation limiting his power to close Gitmo, why would he veto this one?
B) Who is behind this effort to portray Obama as a failure!?
37
posted on
12/26/2010 5:03:58 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: eaglesiniowa
I’m saying it’s regrettable that we have to hold them and pay for their stay at Gitmo.
Since both Bush and Obama won’t let our troops kill the bad guys, we have to hold them. I’d rather spend the money on more bullets than 3 square meals a day for terrorists.
38
posted on
12/26/2010 5:12:49 PM PST
by
Carling
(Remember November)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...
It’s only regrettable insofar as all of the “detainees” haven’t been hanged by their necks until they’re dead, dead, dead. Thanks Sub-Driver.
39
posted on
12/26/2010 5:31:39 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Sub-Driver
Drop them in Afghanistan, 100 yards from a US Base. Give them an AK with 5 bullets so it’s a fair fight.
Problem solved
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson