In a follow up question, Collins was asked about the militaries of our most serious threats to our national security, Al Qeda, China, Russia, Iran, and N Korea? Do they allow LGBTs to serve openly in their militaries? Collins had no comment.
Regarding the follow up question, of course, I jest. But, shouldn't she have been asked? We can only assume the MSM is so loaded with LGBTs, and their enablers, that no follow up questions challenging her premise were allowed.
Here's another follow-up she should have been asked. Will gay men and lesbian women in the military be allowed to adopt, or in the case of lesbians, artificially inseminate, to have children? Making their adoptions, or insemination's, military dependent children? Eligible for all the benefits, like the children of heterosexual military parents, serving in the military?
“In a follow up question, Collins was asked about the militaries of our most serious threats to our national security, Al Qeda, China, Russia, Iran, and N Korea? Do they allow LGBTs to serve openly in their militaries? Collins had no comment.”
Here’s another follow-up question:
Q: Which has more intelligence—an electric toothbrush or Susan Collins?
A: According to the latest battery of tests, there’s no statistical difference! ;)
The proud, the few. Be all you can be. Bunk with gay men and service a gay officer....
I called my local high school and told them to keep this gay organization off the campus. If they go near my son I will sue the school.