“The (USGov) is against nature, and we prove that out of scripture.”
“The (USGov) is in power now because he is a thief and a murderer.”
“God hates (USGov), and he will destroy it.”
“The (USGov) has never taught you about God. He lied, and told you he was God.”
Could the above, be what they were really trying to say?
Well how about:
The democrats have set up laws where the faggots and lesbians have rights, and parades.”
“The democrats are against nature, and we prove that out of scripture.”
“The democrats are in power now because they are thieves and murderers.”
“God hates the democrats, and he will destroy them.”
“The democrat has never taught you about God. He lied, and told you he was God.”
I can’t defend Republicans who vote against the core beliefs of the people who sacrificed their own labor to man phone banks and provide donations that helped put them in power.
Scott Brown voted for the START act. I expected Democrats to support it, but it was Republicans who provided the extra 9 votes required for a 2/3 majority. Scott Brown also voted for the DADT repeal.
The tax bill was loaded with special-interest giveaways.
In the interest of exposing runaway government spending, did one Republican exercise their option to ask for a reading of the bill on the floor to at least delay it? (No).
The problems we have aren’t limited to one party, so we shouldn’t be afraid to call them as we see them - even when a Republican is involved.