“I’m going out on a limb here and suggesting that an unarmed drunk adolescent isn’t likely to be reaching out for loaded firearms”
Yes, such people are known for sound judgement.
“and let’s please not forget that White’s son was also carrying a gun, a rifle”
So he sees this,, and he’s still there running his mouth? He apparently wasn’t leaving. Why defend this little turd? Blowing out his lamp probably saved his son or some other person in the future from being attacked by him.
The fact remains,, you don’t go to a man’s house, in a group, to pick a fight with his kid,,even a foot or two from the propery line. Maybe the other 3 learned a good lesson.
Well I’m pretty much done here.
You just keep on defending the right to shoot someone under these circumstances.
White should have grabbed his gun, locked his door, phoned the police and been prepared to fire should his life be in danger.
Of course that group of dummies shouldn’t have did what they did....I don’t see myself defending it.
We shall just have to agree to disagree.
I think I’m right, I think the prosecutor was right, I think the jury got it right, I think the appellate court got it right, I even allow that perhaps the pardon has a bit of right to it.
I think YOU are wrong.
You want the last word, have at it.
4 unarmed teenage high school kids are a “lynch mob” ?
They were not even on his property?
This guy deserves 20 to life