Its a bad question. I’d like to ask if congressmen share a two man tent together, do tick checks on one another, huddle together for warmth, etc.
The bottom line is - the military doesn’t need this distraction. I predict that a year from now, when the NYT tries to do its ‘A Year After the Repeal’ story, they will be hard pressed to find half a dozen soldiers serving as openly gay.
Gay people don’t want to serve openly in the military. Gay people, who aren’t presently in the military, think its a great idea for others to serve openly...but they would never do it themselves.
First, queer lovers in uniform with guns is a recipe for death. Second queers in uniform professing queer pride is a recipe for death.
The short answer is that proud queers in the military will have a statistically higher rate of death by friendly fire than queers who understand the safety of DADT. Also, queers can no longer be honorably discharged for being queer. How is that a win for the queer world?