Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB; 2ndDivisionVet
I thought they were very close to getting their magic “270” last I heard.

Electing president by National Popular Vote a bad idea

Five other states have already signed on, including Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and Washington. These five states represent 61 electoral votes, and Massachusetts brings that number up to 73.

IIRC, it flopped in the last session in Albany, NY.

I found 2ndDivisionVet's thread by searching for national popular vote as a keyword. It defaulted to a title search. I'll fix that with two keywords, the other being popular national vote. You have to eliminate one of the spaces to get it under the 20 character limit for keywords. I just tested it.

41 posted on 12/21/2010 2:01:45 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

June 7, 2010 — The New York Senate passed the National Popular Vote bill (S2286A / A1580B), with over two-thirds of both political parties supporting the bill in a 52-7 roll call. The vote was 22-5 among Senate Republicans (with 3 not voting) and 30-2 among Senate Democrats. The bill now goes to the 150-member Assembly where it has 80 sponsors.


62 posted on 12/21/2010 3:59:44 PM PST by mvymvy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson