Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb

Granted, but I think Kim will be content to keep the bulk of his conventional forces behind the DMZ and try to blow up Seoul from stand-off ranges and protect the approaches to Pyongyang.

I could see him using his sizeable Special Forces and assymetric (read SRBMs) to wreak havoc nationwide.

I think the extent of a NORK invasion (realistically) would be a land grab for the 5 Yellow Sea Islands, and try to take and hold a 5-10 mile corridor south of the DMZ (ala the Egyptians in 73’) and sue for peace. Maybe he could make a very abbreviated/suicidal run for Inchon and Seoul . . . I think that is about the best he could hope for.


34 posted on 12/21/2010 12:32:09 PM PST by jhpigott (North Korea - The land of lousy options)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: jhpigott
Granted, but I think Kim will be content to keep the bulk of his conventional forces behind the DMZ and try to blow up Seoul from stand-off ranges and protect the approaches to Pyongyang.

No doubt. But as soon as he tries to blow up Seoul, he also invites a massive cross-border response against the conventional forces.

His options then are to keep them in large bodies, which exposes them to attack; or to scatter them, which makes them militarily useless -- and in these days of GPS-guided bombs, it's not all that expensive to attack even the scattered groups directly.

I could see him using his sizeable Special Forces and assymetric (read SRBMs) to wreak havoc nationwide.

Yes, especially among civilians. The question then would be the extent to which he could disrupt the SK military response.

I think the extent of a NORK invasion (realistically) would be a land grab for the 5 Yellow Sea Islands, and try to take and hold a 5-10 mile corridor south of the DMZ (ala the Egyptians in 73’) and sue for peace.

I agree with your take on what's realistic for the North Koreans to accomplish with conventional forces (assuming they're sane, of course).

And it may well be in their plans to sue for peace, hoping to keep what they've taken by threat of nuclear retaliation should the South refuse to give in. But that presupposes that the South Koreans are willing to bargain with them on that basis.

But I think that, strategically, it would make more sense for SK to clean them out of the corridor; and I think enough other countries are ready to take care of the NK problem, that the US (and probably the South Koreans themselves) can credibly threaten a nuclear response if the North Koreans try to make nuclear threats following an attack.

36 posted on 12/21/2010 12:57:52 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson