Probably the same thing.
Christie apparently thinks it's o.k. for the fellow to lose his Constitutional rights because a corrupt judge in a police state wanted to make an example of him.
Major fail on Cristie's part IMO. I won't forget it. Dispite his rhetoric and record so far on fiscal issues, this clearly shows that he doesn't understand our God-given rights at all, but does show he's basically succeptable to watching political winds and reacting to them.
He granted the request out to him. Blame the guy’s lawyer for not asking for more.
And he had previously gotten rid of the judge