To: ansel12
Interesting but none of that was was what he was on trial for (from what I can glean from this article).
7 posted on
12/20/2010 12:04:31 PM PST by
DManA
To: DManA
Interesting but none of that was was what he was on trial for (from what I can glean from this article).He's a "drug dealer" and all they could find was 1/16th of an ounce?
Is it just me or is there something wrong with that picture?
10 posted on
12/20/2010 12:11:21 PM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 697 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: DManA
Yes it did, he went to prison for the other charges, but since this one was about the drug of choice for liberals, the California style jurors were too hip to bother a wholesome brother over it, and help ‘the man’ harass a drug dealer.
Soon they too can become like California.
16 posted on
12/20/2010 12:26:35 PM PST by
ansel12
(Lonnie, little by little the look of the country changes, because of the men we admire.)
To: DManA
Interesting but none of that was was what he was on trial for (from what I can glean from this article). That was my first thought too. If he had all that stuff going on, why wasn't he charged with any of it? An "illegal search" exclusion of evidence is the thing that comes to mind.
18 posted on
12/20/2010 12:37:01 PM PST by
Bob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson