Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salamander

“The dog *was* under control.

Put on the collar and then step across the “invisible fence”.

You’ll feel *very* “controlled”.”

That’s providing if the system works. I’ve seen cases where dogs with those collars roam freely beyond the “fence” because the idiot owner failed to replace the batteries.


153 posted on 12/20/2010 11:16:26 AM PST by 2CAVTrooper (For those who have had to fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected shall never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: 2CAVTrooper

Who cares? “Invisible” control, by nature, cannot be seen ... the cop couldn’t tell the dog was confined, so he reacted as if it weren’t.

SnakeDoc


160 posted on 12/20/2010 11:18:48 AM PST by SnakeDoctor ("They made it evident to every man [...] that human beings are many, but men are few." -- Herodotus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: 2CAVTrooper

After being “conditioned” by the zaps, most dogs never venture beyond the perimeter, whether it’s on or off.

Invisible fences are, however, useless for sight hounds.

At close to 40mph, the dog is through the “fence” before the collar even has time to trigger.

There is no evidence that this family fell into the “idiot” category, otherwise, the dog would have been shot *off* their property.


197 posted on 12/20/2010 11:38:54 AM PST by Salamander (Can't sleep....the clowns will eat me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson