Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brookhaven
No, that's your assumption. He said he ordered the dog to stop and when it didn't... he shot it to death. A dog coming toward you and barking is different than an attacking dog, and as a cop you should know the difference.

My word... I bet you would have defended the North Carolina trooper who shot the 4 month old kitten because he was terrified for his life.

142 posted on 12/20/2010 11:11:12 AM PST by carton253 (Ask me about The Stainless Banner - a free e-zine dedicated to the armies of the Confederacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: carton253

No, that’s your assumption. He said he ordered the dog to stop and when it didn’t... he shot it to death.


Aren’t you making the assumption here? You are assuming the officer did not think the dog was attacking?

In fact, neither of us know what the officer was thinking at that exact moment. But what is the more logical assumption:

(1) The officer thought the dog was attacking him, so he shot the dog in self defense.

(2) The officer did not think the dog was attacking him, so he shot the dog for fun.


152 posted on 12/20/2010 11:15:52 AM PST by Brookhaven (Moderates = non-thinkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson