I too am concerned that a poor fundraising effort will weaken the effectiveness of FRPAC.
I am heartened by so much interest in participation, but somewhat discouraged (at the moment) by the lack of specific offers of help.
However, I have gotten a couple of freepmails offering help in putting together a website for FReeper PAC and specific suggestions from experienced PAC leadership.
We have a couple of goals identified but very little in the way of ideas. How should we target the RINOs we’ve identified? We need concrete ideas.
I am researching how to organize a PAC and with Red Steel will do the comparison of other PACs that he suggested. But ... the summary that I need to write for the group will be insufficient if we don’t know what we want to accomplish and how.
With all due respect, I suspect using the "Freeper" connotation is going to be a non-starter.
JimRob should insist on some kind of veto power and in the case of a disagreement, he'll necessarily yank the authority to use the term.
In which case any ostensible leadership of the PAC will have to defer to the de-facto leader, and that will compliacte filings I suspect.
sam_paine, your comments were excellent.
Others have voiced their opinion, I see some 1998ers and 2000ers.
Could we ping those who have been around here since this forum began for their opinions?