Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian

I love that idea, but the problem would be that the states that would pass this would be red states that Obama can’t win anyway. Now if we could get Florida, Ohio, North Carolina then that would be a way to work this. But if it is Texas, Utah, Montana, Idaho we might not make as great an impression.


18 posted on 12/19/2010 3:14:43 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

The thought is that it would make him quit after a first term if it looked like a trend was developing.


21 posted on 12/19/2010 3:27:40 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
I love that idea, but the problem would be that the states that would pass this would be red states that Obama can’t win anyway.

That is not the point. The point is that if even one single state puts up such a requirement, and Obama does not or cannot fulfill it before the election, then we go into a presidential election where Obama isn't on the ballot in an entire state because he couldn't prove his eligibility. Think of how that would look to the other 49 states. Who, besides the most ideologically anti-American, would vote for a guy who couldn't even show he was eligible to run?
23 posted on 12/19/2010 3:37:25 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
"But if it is Texas, Utah, Montana, Idaho we might not make as great an impression."

It only takes ONE state. The media could not ignore a failure to provide REQUIRED information on the part of ANY prospective candidate.

29 posted on 12/19/2010 3:52:03 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson