Posted on 12/18/2010 3:37:42 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Revisit this thread when problems arise.
“Big Pandora’s box.”
Got that right,
I’ve been trying to tell people - the Military is more “fair” that they think.
The next step in the assualt is for a gay person to challenge the ARs in court. After the judge rules - the ARs will have to be written to be gay friendly.
Then gay partnerships for BAS and BAQ
Then -...............It will never end.
There going to have to re-write the UCMJ for the Sodomites.
They are going to have to rewrite a lot of rules.
Holy Crap! I forgot all about the UCMJ. Way back when in my old Navy days, we used to laugh and joke about the “penetration however slight” part. Did “they” even think about this before rushing this BS through?
I once saw an Article 15 for sodomy where a guy performed anal sex with his wife. I think it wasn’t consensual and she went to the hospital. They were both career enlisted. He lost his stripe and was forced out for High Year of Tenure. What was ironic is they stayed married after his career was ruined. Sodomy doesn’t only apply to gays. Are they going to decriminalize adultery and fraternization in the military next?
Some folks were warning that simple stripping out of the DADT clauses would cause automatic fallback to this. But I can’t believe gays have out foxed themselves. What was the text of the repeal? Anyone know its exact legal force?
I cannot see how they cannot.
Sodomy is a term used in the law to describe the act of "unnatural" sex, which depending on jurisdiction can consist of oral sex or anal sex or any non-genital to genital congress, whether heterosexual, or homosexual, or with human or animal.
Don't worry Obama will task freshman Senator Brown and rump ranger representative Bawney Fwank from the Gay State of Assachusetts will rewrite the UCMJ to remove sodomy.
That’ll be changed, too...just give it some time.
The rule still applies. Two service members caught penetrating the various orifices of another same sex service member will be subject to dismissal.
Wouldn’t it be sweet justice for the military to “mis-interpret” the repeal of DADT and start prosecuting gays out of the military???
LOL... What would Zero have to say about it?? Ummm... we need to ignore that law fellas.... obey your commander... not the law!
Soetoro Dunham Obama cancels basketball game, why? Does he have a male date while moochelle is out of DC?
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/2010-12-18-2865618374_x.htm
Military Should ‘Expressly Prohibit’ Heterosexuals from Using Separate Showers from Homosexuals...
CNSNews ^ | December 18, 2010 | Terence P. Jeffrey
Posted on December 18, 2010 6:11:51 PM EST by jazusamo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2644693/posts
Voting present is a clear pattern.
This is the house version: http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.6520:
It means that homosexual activity is still grounds for court martial unless the military decides otherwise.
There will be a class action teabagger lawsuit to have Quiche for breakfast.
Any changes to the UCMJ have to be approved by Congress and signed into law by executive order.
We are no longer the nation of General ‘Blackjack’ Pershing. We are the nation of Admiral Mullen.
We are weakening, and the dogs of war can smell it.
God has removed his protective hand from the United States.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.