Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pontiac

In principle, I don’t care if gays serve or not, and actually think DADT was a good compromise.

However, now that it has been over-turned, this is going to open a whole can of worms:

Federally recognized gay marriage in the military, death and spousal benefits, bringing homos from overseas as life partners, open gay housing on military barracks with gay couples living like married couples and everything that goes along with it.

Plus, if being gay is the same thing as being heterosexual in terms of sexuality, why would straight men or women want gays ogling them all the time?

Are we going to do away with separation of male and female quarters also and have just have one big happy non-genderized love fest?

The military’s object is to defend the United States; it isn’t about despicable liberal social engineering and turning our culture upside down in deference to cultural Marxism.


44 posted on 12/18/2010 1:47:51 PM PST by radpolis (Liberals: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: radpolis

This is the BEST statement regarding this issue.

Start with the bottom line: “The military’s object is to defent the United States; it isn’t about any freaking thing else, ever !!”

Anyone who doesn’t understand this is subservient to lesser standards, and sad.


53 posted on 12/18/2010 1:55:16 PM PST by onona (dbada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson