The courts have denied us the fundamental common law right to quo warranto; the Congress has not challenged the eligibility of the Kenyan usurper; it is unsurprising then that it falls to a decorated veteran to say quo warranto, is Obama eligible to command our armed forces?
Winston Churchill wrote in his magisterial History of the English-Speaking Peoples about quo warranto and how powerful a device it was in the hands of Charles II: "The Whig corporations were asked by writs of Quo Warranto to prove their title to their long-used liberties. These titles were found in many cases, to the satisfaction of the royal judges, to be defective. Under these pressures large number of hitherto hostile corporations threw themselves under the mercy of the Crown..."
We have been denied that same common law right by our courts.
A decorated veteran has now said: "Show us where you are eligible to serve as our Commander-in-Chief", and the Kenyan usurper has responded with utter contempt for this man's concerns and this man's honorable service to our country.
The corrosive effect on military morale caused by any question about the very eligibility of the Commander-in-Chief to serve in that position is profound. History shows that such corrosion is utter poison in the veins of any country.
The Kenyan usurper has had years to present clear and convincing evidence of his natural born citizenship. He has failed to do so, and it is evident that he cannot.
It is clear that BO’s pResidency is illegitimate.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/05/aka-obama-ineligible-if-he-was-born-on.html