Replies

Because if he wasn't damaged in any way he would have to grounds to appeal....It's Kabuki theater. Each is playing their role to get to the final outcome. Anything decided against BO eligibility would be appealed and take a great deal of time thus throwing the country in complete chaos for a long period of time.

Only the SCOTUS truly has the power to convict, and the congress to remove. Expect it to be done in a few hours not months to "save us from a civil war". Think about it. Timing is everything.

Lakin NOW has standing....others were questionable. The case has a realistic premise (Orders of CiC by a fraud).....others were questionable. Any discovery would not settle the case because BO would have the right to appeal any judgment, therefore, all lower courts have taken ridiculous actions to avoid or as Justice Thomas said evade the proof...pushing it up the ladder to the SCOTUS

Expect any case that the SCOTUS has 'tabled' be returned when this one is before them. BUt not before Boehner is sworn into office as Speaker unless you want Nancy as President.

God bless Lakin.

Lakin NOW has standing....others were questionable. The case has a realistic premise (Orders of CiC by a fraud).....others were questionable. Any discovery would not settle the case because BO would have the right to appeal any judgment, therefore, all lower courts have taken ridiculous actions to avoid or as Justice Thomas said evade the proof...pushing it up the ladder to the SCOTUS.

Standing to do what? To appeal his sentence, yes, but his sworn admission that he knowingly violated legal orders is binding against him on appeal, so the issues he can raise in that appeal are strictly limited. If you think this somehow now gives him standing to sue in a civilian court to have Obama's eligibility determined, no it doesn't.

I hope and PRAY that you are right. Please Lord, deliver us from this evil.

I would think they wouldn’t go to SCOTUS again without some additional proof.

There is another option open to Lakin now if he can indeed show injury. Quo Warranto. It’s a fast track to challenge an office holder’s bona fides.

Leo Donofrio had researched this in depth quite a while ago. Cannot locate Leo’s pages on this currently, but the web site below will give you an idea of what it entails. A lot more info is out there via google.

http://www.constitution.org/writ/quo_warranto.htm

SCOTUS is not going to hear the case of a soldier who pled guilty to disobeying orders that he admitted were lawful, nor will Congress investigate Lakin’s case. Lakin was done when he pled guilty.

I am all for taking a case to SCOTUS on the issue of BO’s illegitimate pResidency, but Lakin’s case will not do it.

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

Lakin NOW has standing...

How do you figure?

God bless Lakin.

Amen! It isn’t easy standing up for what is right when everything is at stake. There are many biblical stories about it - Esther ‘if I perish, I perish’ is just one. YES, God bless Col Lakin!

Right here on this thread - show who are on the other side - who stand for nothing. Wimps are a dime a dozen, true character is rare.