For those slow on the uptake, I am referring to the documentation said state would produce upon request in 2012 if another state passed a law requiring that for the ballot.
“2. The Supreme Court defined natural born citizen as “born in the country to parents who were its citizens.” Under this standard, Stitchy would need to provide documentation of his U.S. birth and his parents’ birth/naturalization papers. Shouldn’t be a problem, no??”
Nope. Your confidence that the Supreme Court has defined NBC as that is yours alone and is not binding upon anyone. You are free to support writing a state law demanding that. But it will be litigated, and then an answer will be formally documented for all.
1. You missed the point. You said no state can ask for documentation in excess of what another state provides, and I’m responding that no state has provded ANY documentation for Stitch Lips. IOW, there’s no ‘excess’ to talk about because nothing has been provided to begin with. Keep up.
2. Any law citing the Supreme Court’s definition of NBC has a great chance of withstanding challenges based on ... what?? Hope and Change?? What else do you have that trumps the Supreme Court and its definition??