What’s fascinating about this is that they’re carrying on about issues which, as Old Deck Hand said, aren’t controversial at all. Legally, they are CRYSTAL CLEAR.
If these people want to complain about legalese and Alice-in-Wonderland stuff, they should latch on to environmental and safety regulations. I did work for private industry once that has made me a consultant on certain types of cases, and Good God Almighty. Way too much of that is just completely mindless. I actually did a case once that turned on how much exposure to a certain chemical a worker could get if he could stay alive in a room engulfed in flames. Seriously. I found a sentence in a related reg that weaseled out of that, but it’s so painful. You have to think like them to beat them.
That is what's so fascinating. Ignoring the law while claiming to support it.
“What’s fascinating about this is that they’re carrying on about issues which, as Old Deck Hand said, aren’t controversial at all. Legally, they are CRYSTAL CLEAR.”
To attornies they may be clear, but not to real people. Once again, this has been argued in depth with no resolution possible. We apparently operate under different paradigms.
BTW - You are correct about environmental regulations. I, unhappily, worked 24 years in the environmental field in a state agency. Absolute nightmare....the lawyers were wacko as were the regulations.