Would a civilian court hearing the case of a road crew manager who refused to plow a street upon the Mayor’s order allow the refusenik the ability to contest the Mayor’s eligibility for office, to demand proof of birth place, citizenship and age aided by power of subpoena, oath and subject to cross-examination?
And what such road crew manager could be charged with International War Crimes if he did unquestioningly do so?
I doubt it but IANAL. Our system of justice requires the plaintiff to prove his case. It doesn’t require the defendant to prove his innocence or the plaintiff’s case.
Birthers continue to pose one ridiculous scenario after another in an attempt to obtain a different answer - an answer with which they agree.
Isn’t that the definition of insanity? Repeating the same action and expecting a different result?