Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cardhu
As I said yesterday:

The President, rather than fork over an undisputed Birth Certificate, would watch a soldier in his service sent to prison.

Class act, Barry.

20 posted on 12/16/2010 1:34:46 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Izzy Dunne

Think the Left will be writing any songs for Terry Lakain, who refused to fight?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camilo_Mej%C3%ADa


27 posted on 12/16/2010 1:41:14 PM PST by a fool in paradise (The establishment clause isn't just against my OWN government establishing state religion in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Izzy Dunne

Perhap as Commander in Chief, he didn’t believe a soldier in his service should dictate to him what he should do?


50 posted on 12/16/2010 1:52:24 PM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Izzy Dunne
"The President, rather than fork over an undisputed Birth Certificate, would watch a soldier in his service sent to prison."

One has nothing to do with the other. Lakin wasn't convicted because Obama didn't supply something.

130 posted on 12/16/2010 2:34:52 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Izzy Dunne

I feel so badly for Col. Lakin. I do think he was poorly advised. He did his duty as he saw it, as did the judge and the jury. I’m not about to condemn any of them. In the meanwhile, an honorable 20+ years career and its attendant retirement benefits down the drain. He’d have been better off years ago choosing private practice. But 6 months confinement is less than I’d expected.

BUT, as to your comment, the birth certificate is not really the issue, imho. It’s a red herring. The real Constitutional question is what was the intent and understanding of the Framers who inserted the language ‘natural born citizen’ in the Constitution for the Office of President only. The SCOTUS has never defined that phrase.

That question is a lot bigger than Obama or any single person. It is time the term be defined by the SCOTUS. Obama’s birth certificate could establish his ineligibility if it shows he was not born in the USA, but it alone would not establish his eligibility, based on his parentage.

We have a huge population of ‘anchor babies’ who may or may not meet the qualification under various interpretations. One definition (Vattel) would exclude them, and Obama, as both parents were not US citizens when they were born; that presents the dual allegiance issue the Framers wanted to avoid in the CinC.


149 posted on 12/16/2010 2:45:03 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Izzy Dunne

Every communist leader has to make his bones takeing a political prisoner. If he didn’t do this Fidel would be laughing at him.


267 posted on 12/16/2010 4:24:41 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Izzy Dunne

I think he expected more to follow him, but they didn’t. One person is a kook....twenty.... hundreds asking the same question, then you have a movement...and it cannot be ignored....

The birth certificate will be an issue in the next election, I promise you....

As will all the other documents he’s been hiding....

And guess who will be demanding it? The left...


499 posted on 12/17/2010 4:09:41 AM PST by nikos1121 (Praying for the big -24 today and -27 by the end of the month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson