Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer
Hairy Reid isn't interested in a standalone bill because that could lose enough votes in the House to have it stopped there.

The real deal here is that homosexuals already get to serve in the military but they have to keep their mouths shut about it.

Removing DADT simply allows them to begin harrassing everybody else with homosexual comeons ~ these guys DO advertise and DO bother straight people.

They are such an uncommonly small minority (less than 1%) they work it all the time ~ and become quite obnoxious about it.

I'd be interested in why Senator Brown thinks it's good to have homosexuals soliciting sex all the time in the military. Is this what he couldn't do, or what? Just what is his angle. And this guy can't tell me he hasn't been around them.

73 posted on 12/16/2010 10:11:35 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
I agree... and I have friends serving now that say that they grab arse in the showers and are a distraction. The Commandant of the Marine Corps has said as much... and says he does not want his Marines dying because of this distraction. I predict lethal results for fags in combat... for themselves and those having to serve with them.

LLS

76 posted on 12/16/2010 10:40:12 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson