Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSac

For the relative mass yes.

The atomic mass is different. You asked me what it stated for the atomic mass.


127 posted on 12/15/2010 10:04:33 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi
Whatever. Do you still stand behind the erroneous statements you made that started this?

“The atomic mass of CL 35 is 35.453 as a result of CL 35 having 17 protons and 18 neutrons”

“CL 35 the 35 means that it has 17 protons and 18 neutrons. Why isn’t this 35.000 instead of 35.453? Because the mass of the neutron is the combined mass of a proton plus an electron. That’s where you get the extra bit on.”

135 posted on 12/16/2010 5:34:57 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson