“Not on the missing movement. Lakin pleaded not guilty.”
He admitted orders were legal, and expressed regret for not obeying them. He merely argued he was not ordered to be on that particular flight.
In United States v. Rhodes (1866), Mr. Justice Swayne, sitting in the Circuit Court, said:
All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects
191 posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:06:50 PM by Mr Rogers
Why don’t you man up, rogers ole boy, and admit that you are wrong and not knowledgeable enough of the law, any law, to answer any of my questions or refute any of my legal arguments?
Thank you for posting the essay supporting the FACT that BO, by his own admission, was born a British subject and consequently BO is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, and NOT QUALIFIED to be POTUS.
Here’s another assignment for you, Rogers, ole boy. See if you can find a single case that refutes the FACT the BO is subject to the Original Jurisdiction of SCOTUS for lawsuits contesting his illegitimate pResidency.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html
The prosecution/government brought up Lakin’s motive front and center to the court, which they used to convict him on the missing movement that he pled not guilty. It is part of the court record. It is irrelevant that the defense omitted it. It is now fair game for Lakin to use it that Obama is not a natural born citizen in any appeal.