Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catman67

“Dems always “reinterpret” the law to suit the occasion. Witness the New Jersey Supreme Court.”

Exactly. “Well, I amended it.” — So, there. Case closed. What are we even arguing about? Oh, Rahm left his most “valuable possessions” at his old house (in a box, in a basement, that he had no access to)... and those are, of course, his wife’s wedding dress and the clothes his babies wore when they came home after being born. Oh, Rahm! Such a good guy! Strike up the violins! How can the people’s will POSSIBLY be denied?! Rules were made to be broken, after all.

Anyone else out there think they can’t get any more sickened by these people?


9 posted on 12/15/2010 7:09:17 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Pravious

If a man is willing to commit perjury on his tax return, he’s willing to lie about what’s stored in his basement.


15 posted on 12/15/2010 9:08:13 AM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson