Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Think of the precedent such behavior potentially establishes. If we succumb to the North's demands, then what do we do with the Taliban?Iran? Let them attack anything and everyone because we don't "respect" their right to negotiate better deals for their people, then we sheepishly come to the bargaining table? Such logic is rooted in naïve foreign relations.

Mr. Armstrong may not have noticed that we've been succumbing to NK's demands for a long time, or at least let them get away with what would be intolerable elsewhere, and yet it has not set a precedent in other parts of the world.

Any subsequent argument based on "avoiding a precedent" is fatally flawed.

I think pretty much everybody -- including the bad guys -- recognizes that the Korean Peninsula is a special case.

7 posted on 12/14/2010 3:57:09 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

I disagree. I think Iran is noticing the N.K. precedent.

N.K., Iran, Syria, South America... all are part of the get nuke insurance group.


9 posted on 12/14/2010 4:57:35 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson