That's a question for a whole different thread.
This is the second time in this thread that you have referred to "evidence." The Obot judge in charge of this kangaroo court won't allow any.
And even if Colonel Lind had allowed it, how would it have exonerated Lakin from refusing to obey the lawful orders of three of his superior officers? It's a simple question to answer. Have at it.
You are as deceptive as your hero Obama.
You seem to be as befuddled as your heroine Taitz sometimes.
At least two of the charges were based on orders made in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. By declaring Obama's eligibility as irrelevant, Judge Lind is basically stopping a jury from hearing Lakin's reasonable questions about Obama's constitutional eligibility as it relates to his officer's oath and a directive from the White House for a troop surge in Afghanistan. Thus, Lakin can't ask these officers he disobeyed: Was your order in direct support of Obama's surge? Would you have made this order if there was no surge? Would you have made this order if it was known the president was not constitutionally empowered to be your commander in chief? Can you, independent of the chain of command, order troops to deploy for combat operations any time and any place you choose??