Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

You are correct of course. The court will not overturn Obamacare because then they will have to revisit all the other unconstitutional power grabs like social security and medicare.

To a lot of the nutless black-robed maggots, Stare decisis—precidence is more important than Originalism.

I hope I’m wrong. It’s the Kennedy court. Does he have the brass ones to reverse 60 years on unconstitutional law?
To put a STOP SIGN in this Socialist fork in the road?


107 posted on 12/13/2010 2:04:04 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (I'm armed and Amish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Electric Graffiti
You are correct of course. The court will not overturn Obamacare because then they will have to revisit all the other unconstitutional power grabs like social security and medicare. To a lot of the nutless black-robed maggots, Stare decisis—precidence is more important than Originalism. I hope I’m wrong. It’s the Kennedy court. Does he have the brass ones to reverse 60 years on unconstitutional law? To put a STOP SIGN in this Socialist fork in the road?

Well, I hope I'm wrong. The only real hope is that they focus on the "mandate" as somehow being constitutionally different from establishing a program directly with tax dollars. Oddly, though I think this law should be unconstitutional, focusing on this "mandate" angle that doesn't appear to have any particularly constitutional basis would mean we're inventing one bogus constitutional doctrine to kill another.

Makes my head hurt.

110 posted on 12/13/2010 3:20:54 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson