Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
"implicit right of civilian ownership of naval artillery?" ***Interesting. This is the first I’ve heard of this angle. Do you have some further references or links?

The U.S. Constitution provides in Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have Power ... To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
Letters of Marque and Reprisal allowed armed civilian ships to capture enemy shipping in a manner that would otherwise be piracy. That these and other civilian ships would be armed was a given in the 18th century.
106 posted on 12/12/2010 3:22:09 PM PST by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: rmlew

Basically privateers, right? Sounds a lot like militia to me. Thanks for the link.


111 posted on 12/12/2010 3:47:19 PM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: rmlew

There are so many laws & precedents & rabbit holes in the constitution now, that even members of the SCOTUS are just following their own emotional opinions rather than seriously deliberating the issues. It’s a tragedy, and a sign that this republic could be doomed.


115 posted on 12/12/2010 3:51:25 PM PST by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson